Super Rich NonsenseSuper Rich Nonsense by Pat Boone: “I don’t have a problem with super-wealthy people using their money to influence the political process. Have at it. But they ought to be straight with us: If Bill Gates, Warren Buffett or “the fabulously wealthy” Teresa Heinz take a certain position on legislation, they ought to make it clear whether they will personally benefit in some way.” April 30, 2004 | Read more… R.I.P.“Only in the United States are we issued a certificate at birth, a license at marriage and a tax bill — at death! At the 60 Plus Association, our battle cry for over 10 years has been to kill the ‘death tax’, not wound it but kill it.” says 60 Plus President, Jim Martin. April 15, 2004 | Read more… Death Tax: A Grave Matter For Virginia’s SeniorsDying Should Not Be A Taxable Event Statement By 60 Plus Association President Jim Martin January 14, 2004 | Read more… Death Tax Still Breathing“The death tax was not killed yesterday, it was only wounded. It needs to have a wooden stake driven through its heart so that it will stay buried a fourth and final time.” June 19, 2003 | Read more… Wealth And Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated FortunesAuthors Credit 60 Plus Association President Jim Martin With Renaming The Estate Tax The “Death” Tax. March 18, 2003 | Read more… ‘When You Die, Uncle Sam, Not Even A Blood Relative, Is The First Claimant In Line For Your After-Tax Assets’“We at the 60 Plus Association realize how heavy this tax burden is, especially for senior citizens as well as for their children and grandchildren in the working force.”60 Plus is especially working hard to lower the cost of government, notably by driving a stake in the heart of the cruelest, meanest, and most unnecessary of all taxes– the federal estate or ‘death’ tax.” June 27, 2002 | Read more… Reaction To Rejection Of Repeal Of The Death Tax Today In The SenateIn a town where con jobs are a daily occurrence, the biggest con job of all is the Democrats’ canard that repeal of the Death Tax is a ‘windfall for the wealthy.’ They say it is a ‘tax cut for the rich’ because it affects less than 2% of those who die. Then why is it that nearly 80% of the public favors repeal? It’s because the public cites the unfairness of a tax imposed solely on after-tax assets.”The biggest fable of all is that only about 3,000 super rich families get this tax break. The truth is that most of these set up trusts and foundations to protect their assets and who can blame them. June 12, 2002 | Read more… |
Pages Categories Archives |






